NCAA Box Score Analysis
The chart below is taking a look at the previous week’s box scores and showing who may have overachieved or underachieved based on stats.
The program generates an “expected” margin of victory, using actual final game stats, and compares that to the:
1. Las Vegas line (pre-game prediction)
2. Actual margin of victory
So if a team meets or exceeds pre game expectations, by the actual play on the field, they are rewarded. However if they win or lose and are statistically dominated this program will show that.
Key: 1. ATS– Against the spread.
2. Act. Yds vs Act. Spread –How each team did using their yardage stats and turnovers.
3. Game should’ve been.. — A scoring projection based on total yards gained using yards per point.
4. Win Margin—Final game margin.
5. Yds/TO spread conv.— A spread projection using total yards gained/allowed and turnovers.
6. Game tot—Acutal game total.
7. Yppt. Total—A total projection of how many points should’ve been scored based on yards.
8. W/L Projection—An estimation of the final score using actual yards and turnover margin. 9. Margin—A number each team “should’ve” won/loss by.
10. Actual Yds—Total yards gained in the game by the offense. 11. Score should’ve been..—A projection for a score based on the game stats and turnovers.
12. TO—Adjusted TO based on actual and pre-game projection.
13. Next Week—A computer generated suggestion for how a team may do next week. (Good, Bad, Play, Fade)
Good—Played as they were projected to do in the game.
Bad—Played below expectations for the game.
Fade—Played well below expectations for the game.
Play—Played better than final score and should be looked at next week.
(Good/Bad/Fade/Play are just suggestions to look at as a guide. Don’t just automatically use them as they are listed. They are to be used to help not as a magic formula)
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| UCLA | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 10 | 10.90 | 38 | 2.50 | 3.52 | 62 |
| Cincinnati | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -10 | -10.90 | 38 | -2.50 | 5.56 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| UCLA | 44.04 | Should have lost by | 10.90 | 218 | 16.57 | 4 | 3.79 | 12.00 | BAD |
| Cincinnati | 44.04 | Should have won by | 10.90 | 417 | 27.47 | 2 | 2.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| UCLA | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 9-60 |
| Cincinnati | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 8-for-16 | 10-63 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Georgia Tech | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 38 | 46.53 | 66 | 37.00 | 4.67 | 63 |
| Clemson | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -38 | -46.53 | 66 | -37.00 | 8.00 | 79 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Georgia Tech | 74.67 | Should have lost by | 46.53 | 294 | 14.07 | 4 | 0.92 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Clemson | 74.67 | Should have won by | 46.53 | 632 | 60.60 | 3 | 3.00 | 29.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Georgia Tech | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-16 | 2-10 |
| Clemson | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-12 | 6-43 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Florida International | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 28 | 18.84 | 56 | 3.00 | 4.45 | 60 |
| Tulane | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -28 | -18.84 | 56 | -3.00 | 8.01 | 68 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Florida International | 56.42 | Should have lost by | 18.84 | 267 | 18.79 | 2 | 1.75 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Tulane | 56.42 | Should have won by | 18.84 | 545 | 37.63 | 1 | 1.00 | 28.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Florida International | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-12 | 4-35 |
| Tulane | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 7-for-12 | 12-103 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Texas State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 34 | 32.50 | 48 | 34.00 | 3.59 | 61 |
| Texas A&M | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -34 | -32.50 | 48 | -34.00 | 6.64 | 72 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Texas State | 55.30 | Should have lost by | 32.50 | 219 | 11.40 | 4 | 1.17 | 15.00 | PLAY |
| Texas A&M | 55.30 | Should have won by | 32.50 | 478 | 43.90 | 2 | 2.00 | 22.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Texas State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 4-24 |
| Texas A&M | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-11 | 3-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Kent State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 23 | 28.04 | 37 | 24.50 | 3.13 | 64 |
| Arizona State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -23 | -28.04 | 37 | -24.50 | 6.50 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Kent State | 49.56 | Should have lost by | 28.04 | 200 | 10.76 | 2 | -0.04 | 11.00 | FADE |
| Arizona State | 49.56 | Should have won by | 28.04 | 455 | 38.80 | 1 | 1.00 | 18.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Kent State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-18 | 5-42 |
| Arizona State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-16 | 6-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Utah | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -18 | -1.36 | 42 | -5.50 | 5.75 | 64 |
| Brigham Young | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 18 | 1.36 | 42 | 5.50 | 5.45 | 55 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Utah | 46.31 | Should have won by | 1.36 | 368 | 23.84 | 0 | 0.00 | 21.00 | FADE |
| Brigham Young | 46.31 | Should have lost by | 1.36 | 300 | 22.48 | 3 | 2.54 | 14.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Utah | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 3-for-11 | 7-64 |
| Brigham Young | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-12 | 7-63 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Albany | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 17 | 31.37 | 59 | 14.00 | 4.78 | 51 |
| Central Michigan | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -17 | -31.37 | 59 | -14.00 | 6.30 | 84 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Albany | 55.73 | Should have lost by | 31.37 | 244 | 12.18 | 1 | -0.17 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Central Michigan | 55.73 | Should have won by | 31.37 | 529 | 43.55 | 3 | 3.00 | 31.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Albany | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-13 | 4-30 |
| Central Michigan | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-13 | 11-87 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Wagner | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | 29.20 | 45 | 23.50 | 4.20 | 44 |
| Connecticut | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | -29.20 | 45 | -23.50 | 4.84 | 81 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Wagner | 43.24 | Should have lost by | 29.20 | 185 | 7.02 | 0 | -1.96 | 12.00 | FADE |
| Connecticut | 43.24 | Should have won by | 29.20 | 392 | 36.22 | 2 | 2.00 | 26.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Wagner | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-10 | 10-86 |
| Connecticut | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-12 | 7-68 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Robert Morris | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 28 | 28.25 | 48 | 41.50 | 4.44 | 54 |
| Buffalo | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -28 | -28.25 | 48 | -41.50 | 6.21 | 57 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Robert Morris | 47.07 | Should have lost by | 28.25 | 240 | 9.41 | 1 | -2.46 | 11.00 | GOOD |
| Buffalo | 47.07 | Should have won by | 28.25 | 354 | 37.66 | 1 | 1.00 | 21.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Robert Morris | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 8-69 |
| Buffalo | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-11 | 4-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Morgan State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 43 | 51.68 | 49 | 24.00 | 1.75 | 40 |
| Bowling Green | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -43 | -51.68 | 49 | -24.00 | 6.40 | 98 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Morgan State | 55.96 | Should have lost by | 51.68 | 70 | 2.14 | 1 | -1.00 | 4.00 | BAD |
| Bowling Green | 55.96 | Should have won by | 51.68 | 627 | 53.82 | 1 | 1.00 | 37.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Morgan State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-12 | 6-43 |
| Bowling Green | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-17 | 7-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Florida A&M | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 62 | 70.97 | 62 | 44.00 | 1.57 | 61 |
| Central Florida | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -62 | -70.97 | 62 | -44.00 | 7.38 | 94 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Florida A&M | 73.79 | Should have lost by | 70.97 | 96 | 1.41 | 0 | -3.67 | 8.00 | BAD |
| Central Florida | 73.79 | Should have won by | 70.97 | 694 | 72.38 | 0 | 0.00 | 42.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Florida A&M | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-18 | 12-106 |
| Central Florida | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-16 | 7-65 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Gardner Webb | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 21 | 41.28 | 77 | 31.00 | 4.21 | 52 |
| Charlotte | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -21 | -41.28 | 77 | -31.00 | 6.86 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Gardner Webb | 57.00 | Should have lost by | 41.28 | 219 | 7.86 | 1 | -1.58 | 11.00 | FADE |
| Charlotte | 57.00 | Should have won by | 41.28 | 508 | 49.14 | 3 | 3.00 | 27.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Gardner Webb | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-10 | 8-52 |
| Charlotte | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-10 | 4-25 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Central Arkansas | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -7 | 14.77 | 63 | 10.50 | 7.31 | 58 |
| Western Kentucky | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 7 | -14.77 | 63 | -10.50 | 6.59 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Central Arkansas | 63.55 | Should have lost by | 14.77 | 424 | 24.39 | 0 | -0.88 | 17.00 | FADE |
| Western Kentucky | 63.55 | Should have won by | 14.77 | 488 | 39.16 | 2 | 2.00 | 22.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Central Arkansas | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-13 | 6-46 |
| Western Kentucky | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-16 | 6-49 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Alabama State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 5 | 20.23 | 43 | 40.00 | 4.06 | 64 |
| UAB | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -5 | -20.23 | 43 | -40.00 | 4.39 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Alabama State | 41.67 | Should have lost by | 20.23 | 260 | 10.72 | 2 | -1.33 | 12.00 | GOOD |
| UAB | 41.67 | Should have won by | 20.23 | 290 | 30.95 | 2 | 2.00 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Alabama State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-15 | 6-48 |
| UAB | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 1-for-13 | 8-72 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| South Dakota State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | 1.01 | 49 | 14.50 | 6.12 | 60 |
| Minnesota | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | -1.01 | 49 | -14.50 | 5.13 | 60 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| South Dakota State | 46.61 | Should have lost by | 1.01 | 367 | 22.80 | 2 | 0.79 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Minnesota | 46.61 | Should have won by | 1.01 | 308 | 23.81 | 1 | 1.00 | 17.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| South Dakota State | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | 3-for-9 | 4-32 |
| Minnesota | YES | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | 6-for-13 | 3-40 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Northern Colorado | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 17 | 13.22 | 53 | 17.50 | 3.38 | 85 |
| San Jose State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -17 | -13.22 | 53 | -17.50 | 5.97 | 64 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Northern Colorado | 47.62 | Should have lost by | 13.22 | 287 | 17.20 | 2 | 0.54 | 20.00 | GOOD |
| San Jose State | 47.62 | Should have won by | 13.22 | 382 | 30.42 | 1 | 1.00 | 22.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Northern Colorado | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 7-for-20 | 6-50 |
| San Jose State | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 5-for-11 | 8-75 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Rice | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 7 | 14.87 | 21 | 23.50 | 5.52 | 44 |
| Army | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -7 | -14.87 | 21 | -23.50 | 4.44 | 64 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Rice | 37.80 | Should have lost by | 14.87 | 243 | 11.46 | 0 | -1.96 | 10.00 | GOOD |
| Army | 37.80 | Should have won by | 14.87 | 284 | 26.33 | 1 | 1.00 | 17.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Rice | —— | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-11 | 3-20 |
| Army | YES | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-15 | 4-26 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Utah State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 3 | -1.54 | 73 | 5.00 | 7.54 | 79 |
| Wake Forest | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -3 | 1.54 | 73 | -5.00 | 5.51 | 105 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Utah State | 81.09 | Should have won by | 1.54 | 596 | 41.32 | 3 | 2.58 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Wake Forest | 81.09 | Should have lost by | 1.54 | 579 | 39.77 | 1 | 1.00 | 30.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Utah State | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-16 | 8-84 |
| Wake Forest | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 13-for-24 | 1-15 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Wisconsin | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -49 | -19.61 | 49 | -10.00 | 6.28 | 69 |
| South Florida | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 49 | 19.61 | 49 | 10.00 | 2.80 | 56 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Wisconsin | 42.20 | Should have won by | 19.61 | 433 | 30.91 | 1 | 1.00 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| South Florida | 42.20 | Should have lost by | 19.61 | 157 | 11.30 | 3 | 2.17 | 9.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Wisconsin | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 6-for-13 | 4-40 |
| South Florida | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 3-for-14 | 9-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Tulsa | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 21 | 18.11 | 35 | 23.50 | 1.54 | 52 |
| Michigan State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -21 | -18.11 | 35 | -23.50 | 3.88 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Tulsa | 29.69 | Should have lost by | 18.11 | 80 | 5.79 | 3 | 1.04 | 8.00 | GOOD |
| Michigan State | 29.69 | Should have won by | 18.11 | 303 | 23.90 | 0 | 0.00 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Tulsa | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 2-for-11 | 8-80 |
| Michigan State | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 6-for-19 | 14-122 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Massachusetts | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 27 | 29.35 | 69 | 17.00 | 4.28 | 71 |
| Rutgers | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -27 | -29.35 | 69 | -17.00 | 7.39 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Massachusetts | 62.05 | Should have lost by | 29.35 | 304 | 16.35 | 2 | 0.58 | 19.00 | BAD |
| Rutgers | 62.05 | Should have won by | 29.35 | 554 | 45.70 | 3 | 3.00 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Massachusetts | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 7-for-16 | 8-90 |
| Rutgers | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-14 | 7-80 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Colorado State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 21 | -2.45 | 83 | 12.00 | 6.47 | 78 |
| Colorado | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -21 | 2.45 | 83 | -12.00 | 7.92 | 60 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Colorado State | 67.88 | Should have won by | 2.45 | 505 | 35.17 | 4 | 3.00 | 27.00 | PLAY |
| Colorado | 67.88 | Should have lost by | 2.45 | 475 | 32.71 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Colorado State | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | 5-for-12 | 6-64 |
| Colorado | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | 3-for-9 | 4-43 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Purdue | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | -24.67 | 65 | -11.00 | 6.41 | 81 |
| Nevada | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | 24.67 | 65 | 11.00 | 5.25 | 77 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Purdue | 64.63 | Should have won by | 24.67 | 519 | 44.65 | 5 | 5.00 | 24.00 | PLAY |
| Nevada | 64.63 | Should have lost by | 24.67 | 404 | 19.98 | 0 | -0.92 | 19.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Purdue | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-18 | 6-55 |
| Nevada | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-17 | 11-95 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Oklahoma State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -16 | -16.19 | 88 | -13.50 | 7.30 | 76 |
| Oregon State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 16 | 16.19 | 88 | 13.50 | 5.21 | 86 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Oklahoma State | 70.47 | Should have won by | 16.19 | 555 | 43.33 | 0 | 0.00 | 30.00 | GOOD |
| Oregon State | 70.47 | Should have lost by | 16.19 | 448 | 27.14 | 0 | -1.13 | 26.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Oklahoma State | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-13 | 6-55 |
| Oregon State | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 13-for-20 | 8-85 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Florida Atlantic | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 24 | 33.28 | 66 | 27.50 | 3.12 | 73 |
| Ohio State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -24 | -33.28 | 66 | -27.50 | 6.34 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Florida Atlantic | 53.13 | Should have lost by | 33.28 | 228 | 9.93 | 1 | -1.29 | 17.00 | FADE |
| Ohio State | 53.13 | Should have won by | 33.28 | 469 | 43.21 | 2 | 2.00 | 24.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Florida Atlantic | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-17 | 5-35 |
| Ohio State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-14 | 7-62 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| South Alabama | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 14 | 9.48 | 56 | 35.00 | 3.97 | 79 |
| Nebraska | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -14 | -9.48 | 56 | -35.00 | 4.18 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| South Alabama | 42.54 | Should have lost by | 9.48 | 314 | 16.53 | 5 | 2.08 | 19.00 | GOOD |
| Nebraska | 42.54 | Should have won by | 9.48 | 276 | 26.01 | 3 | 3.00 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| South Alabama | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | 7-for-17 | 7-44 |
| Nebraska | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 8-64 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| East Carolina | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 28 | 21.97 | 40 | 17.50 | 3.64 | 74 |
| NC State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -28 | -21.97 | 40 | -17.50 | 7.21 | 70 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| East Carolina | 56.16 | Should have lost by | 21.97 | 269 | 17.10 | 2 | 0.54 | 18.00 | BAD |
| NC State | 56.16 | Should have won by | 21.97 | 505 | 39.07 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| East Carolina | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-15 | 5-53 |
| NC State | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | YES | 4-for-12 | 6-55 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Akron | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 39 | 18.55 | 45 | 17.50 | 2.91 | 66 |
| Illinois | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -39 | -18.55 | 45 | -17.50 | 5.65 | 71 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Akron | 43.27 | Should have lost by | 18.55 | 192 | 12.36 | 2 | 0.54 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Illinois | 43.27 | Should have won by | 18.55 | 401 | 30.91 | 0 | 0.00 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Akron | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 3-for-13 | 5-50 |
| Illinois | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 9-for-15 | 7-75 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Indiana | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -10 | -17.91 | 58 | -18.00 | 6.41 | 74 |
| Ball State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 10 | 17.91 | 58 | 18.00 | 4.91 | 81 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Indiana | 61.74 | Should have won by | 17.91 | 474 | 39.82 | 2 | 2.00 | 25.00 | BAD |
| Ball State | 61.74 | Should have lost by | 17.91 | 398 | 21.92 | 1 | -0.50 | 26.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Indiana | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 6-for-12 | 5-65 |
| Ball State | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 7-for-16 | 5-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Toledo | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 14 | 10.27 | 62 | 9.50 | 5.42 | 64 |
| Kentucky | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -14 | -10.27 | 62 | -9.50 | 6.49 | 65 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Toledo | 53.60 | Should have lost by | 10.27 | 347 | 21.67 | 2 | 1.21 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Kentucky | 53.60 | Should have won by | 10.27 | 422 | 31.94 | 2 | 2.00 | 20.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Toledo | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 7-for-16 | 11-80 |
| Kentucky | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 3-for-11 | 7-61 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Mississippi State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -10 | -12.39 | 66 | -19.00 | 7.10 | 70 |
| UL Lafayette | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 10 | 12.39 | 66 | 19.00 | 5.51 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Mississippi State | 65.66 | Should have won by | 12.39 | 497 | 39.03 | 2 | 2.00 | 29.00 | BAD |
| UL Lafayette | 65.66 | Should have lost by | 12.39 | 430 | 26.64 | 4 | 2.42 | 27.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Mississippi State | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | YES | 4-for-9 | 5-40 |
| UL Lafayette | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | —— | 4-for-10 | 6-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Mississippi | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 5 | 14.66 | 25 | 3.50 | 3.33 | 52 |
| Memphis | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -5 | -14.66 | 25 | -3.50 | 4.44 | 82 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Mississippi | 37.37 | Should have lost by | 14.66 | 173 | 11.36 | 1 | 0.71 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Memphis | 37.37 | Should have won by | 14.66 | 364 | 26.02 | 1 | 1.00 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Mississippi | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-10 | 3-35 |
| Memphis | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-17 | 10-75 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Georgia State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -8 | 20.84 | 68 | 24.50 | 4.57 | 77 |
| Tennessee | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 8 | -20.84 | 68 | -24.50 | 5.69 | 71 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Georgia State | 54.29 | Should have lost by | 20.84 | 352 | 16.73 | 1 | -1.04 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Tennessee | 54.29 | Should have won by | 20.84 | 404 | 37.57 | 3 | 3.00 | 21.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Georgia State | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 10-for-17 | 5-31 |
| Tennessee | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 8-for-13 | 3-24 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Eastern Michigan | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | 9.82 | 53 | -4.50 | 5.11 | 57 |
| Coastal Carolina | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | -9.82 | 53 | 4.50 | 5.18 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Eastern Michigan | 46.00 | Should have lost by | 9.82 | 291 | 18.09 | 1 | 1.00 | 20.00 | FADE |
| Coastal Carolina | 46.00 | Should have won by | 9.82 | 378 | 27.91 | 4 | 3.63 | 23.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Eastern Michigan | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-11 | 5-32 |
| Coastal Carolina | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 6-for-16 | 9-79 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| South Carolina | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 4 | 6.46 | 44 | -12.00 | 4.43 | 61 |
| North Carolina | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -4 | -6.46 | 44 | 12.00 | 6.36 | 76 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| South Carolina | 51.07 | Should have lost by | 6.46 | 270 | 22.30 | 2 | 2.00 | 15.00 | BAD |
| North Carolina | 51.07 | Should have won by | 6.46 | 483 | 28.76 | 1 | 0.00 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| South Carolina | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 3-for-12 | 9-75 |
| North Carolina | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 5-for-16 | 10-90 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Duke | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 39 | 36.40 | 45 | 34.00 | 3.78 | 54 |
| Alabama | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -39 | -36.40 | 45 | -34.00 | 6.56 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Duke | 57.52 | Should have lost by | 36.40 | 204 | 10.56 | 3 | 0.17 | 11.00 | BAD |
| Alabama | 57.52 | Should have won by | 36.40 | 512 | 46.96 | 1 | 1.00 | 30.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Duke | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-12 | 8-52 |
| Alabama | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-12 | 8-88 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Northwestern | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 10 | 9.58 | 24 | 6.50 | 3.50 | 60 |
| Stanford | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -10 | -9.58 | 24 | -6.50 | 5.00 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Northwestern | 40.22 | Should have lost by | 9.58 | 210 | 15.32 | 4 | 3.46 | 15.00 | BAD |
| Stanford | 40.22 | Should have won by | 9.58 | 365 | 24.90 | 2 | 2.00 | 21.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Northwestern | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-14 | 8-67 |
| Stanford | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 7-for-16 | 8-78 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Virginia Tech | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | -11.02 | 63 | -4.00 | 4.97 | 89 |
| Boston College | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | 11.02 | 63 | 4.00 | 5.76 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Virginia Tech | 60.34 | Should have won by | 11.02 | 442 | 35.68 | 5 | 5.00 | 29.00 | PLAY |
| Boston College | 60.34 | Should have lost by | 11.02 | 432 | 24.66 | 1 | 0.67 | 18.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Virginia Tech | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | 8-for-18 | 4-20 |
| Boston College | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | 9-for-19 | 6-32 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Syracuse | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -24 | -16.35 | 24 | -19.50 | 4.66 | 79 |
| Liberty | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 24 | 16.35 | 24 | 19.50 | 3.08 | 76 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Syracuse | 43.55 | Should have won by | 16.35 | 368 | 29.95 | 3 | 3.00 | 17.00 | FADE |
| Liberty | 43.55 | Should have lost by | 16.35 | 234 | 13.60 | 4 | 2.38 | 18.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Syracuse | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | 8-for-19 | 10-88 |
| Liberty | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | 3-for-16 | 5-55 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Southern Methodist | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -7 | -1.58 | 67 | 1.50 | 5.40 | 94 |
| Arkansas State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 7 | 1.58 | 67 | -1.50 | 5.59 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Southern Methodist | 63.53 | Should have won by | 1.58 | 508 | 32.55 | 1 | 0.88 | 29.00 | GOOD |
| Arkansas State | 63.53 | Should have lost by | 1.58 | 414 | 30.98 | 3 | 3.00 | 25.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Southern Methodist | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | 9-for-17 | 5-50 |
| Arkansas State | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 3-for-13 | 11-83 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Middle Tennessee | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 19 | 31.25 | 61 | 36.50 | 4.36 | 69 |
| Michigan | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -19 | -31.25 | 61 | -36.50 | 5.81 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Middle Tennessee | 58.34 | Should have lost by | 31.25 | 301 | 13.54 | 2 | -1.04 | 16.00 | GOOD |
| Michigan | 58.34 | Should have won by | 31.25 | 453 | 44.79 | 2 | 2.00 | 26.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Middle Tennessee | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-15 | 8-54 |
| Michigan | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-13 | 8-55 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Miami (Ohio) | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 24 | 28.79 | 52 | 25.50 | 4.71 | 52 |
| Iowa | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -24 | -28.79 | 52 | -25.50 | 6.55 | 71 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Miami (Ohio) | 53.28 | Should have lost by | 28.79 | 245 | 12.24 | 1 | -1.13 | 11.00 | FADE |
| Iowa | 53.28 | Should have won by | 28.79 | 465 | 41.04 | 1 | 1.00 | 26.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Miami (Ohio) | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-12 | 10-77 |
| Iowa | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-14 | 5-32 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Georgia Southern | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 52 | 34.80 | 58 | 27.00 | 1.96 | 50 |
| Louisiana State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -52 | -34.80 | 58 | -27.00 | 6.56 | 72 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Georgia Southern | 45.70 | Should have lost by | 34.80 | 98 | 5.45 | 2 | -0.25 | 8.00 | BAD |
| Louisiana State | 45.70 | Should have won by | 34.80 | 472 | 40.25 | 0 | 0.00 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Georgia Southern | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 1-for-12 | 5-20 |
| Louisiana State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 8-for-14 | 7-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Georgia | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -24 | -29.30 | 36 | -22.00 | 7.63 | 63 |
| Vanderbilt | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 24 | 29.30 | 36 | 22.00 | 3.63 | 62 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Georgia | 52.58 | Should have won by | 29.30 | 481 | 40.94 | 1 | 1.00 | 25.00 | GOOD |
| Vanderbilt | 52.58 | Should have lost by | 29.30 | 225 | 11.64 | 1 | -0.83 | 17.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Georgia | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 1-for-7 | 10-117 |
| Vanderbilt | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-14 | 10-63 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Virginia | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -16 | -0.34 | 44 | -2.50 | 4.63 | 67 |
| Pittsburgh | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 16 | 0.34 | 44 | 2.50 | 3.70 | 71 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Virginia | 39.58 | Should have won by | 0.34 | 310 | 19.96 | 0 | 0.00 | 20.00 | FADE |
| Pittsburgh | 39.58 | Should have lost by | 0.34 | 263 | 19.62 | 2 | 1.79 | 15.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Virginia | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | YES | YES | 7-for-15 | 3-35 |
| Pittsburgh | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | —— | 7-for-16 | 5-51 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Missouri | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 6 | -25.81 | 68 | -15.50 | 5.97 | 90 |
| Wyoming | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -6 | 25.81 | 68 | 15.50 | 6.71 | 58 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Missouri | 65.70 | Should have won by | 25.81 | 537 | 45.76 | 3 | 3.00 | 28.00 | PLAY |
| Wyoming | 65.70 | Should have lost by | 25.81 | 389 | 19.95 | 0 | -1.29 | 16.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Missouri | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | 7-for-17 | 5-31 |
| Wyoming | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-12 | 5-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Oregon | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 6 | 7.55 | 48 | 4.00 | 4.74 | 70 |
| Auburn | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -6 | -7.55 | 48 | -4.00 | 5.11 | 75 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Oregon | 49.44 | Should have lost by | 7.55 | 332 | 20.95 | 1 | 0.67 | 17.00 | BAD |
| Auburn | 49.44 | Should have won by | 7.55 | 383 | 28.50 | 2 | 2.00 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Oregon | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-14 | 7-58 |
| Auburn | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-17 | 7-60 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Louisiana Tech | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 31 | 10.32 | 59 | 19.50 | 5.16 | 80 |
| Texas | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -31 | -10.32 | 59 | -19.50 | 6.22 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Louisiana Tech | 61.28 | Should have lost by | 10.32 | 413 | 25.48 | 3 | 1.38 | 25.00 | PLAY |
| Texas | 61.28 | Should have won by | 10.32 | 454 | 35.80 | 1 | 1.00 | 24.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Louisiana Tech | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | 5-for-14 | 5-40 |
| Texas | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | 8-for-15 | 6-47 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| New Mexico State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 51 | 37.25 | 65 | 33.50 | 4.73 | 67 |
| Washington State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -51 | -37.25 | 65 | -33.50 | 8.96 | 69 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| New Mexico State | 73.19 | Should have lost by | 37.25 | 317 | 17.97 | 3 | 0.21 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Washington State | 73.19 | Should have won by | 37.25 | 618 | 55.22 | 0 | 0.00 | 28.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| New Mexico State | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | 5-for-15 | 2-0 |
| Washington State | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | 4-for-9 | 6-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Fresno State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 8 | 9.70 | 54 | 14.50 | 5.85 | 79 |
| Southern California | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -8 | -9.70 | 54 | -14.50 | 5.73 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Fresno State | 63.22 | Should have lost by | 9.70 | 462 | 26.76 | 3 | 1.79 | 22.00 | GOOD |
| Southern California | 63.22 | Should have won by | 9.70 | 447 | 36.46 | 4 | 4.00 | 25.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Fresno State | —— | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-16 | 6-51 |
| Southern California | YES | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | 6-for-13 | 4-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Howard | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 79 | 54.62 | 79 | 32.00 | 1.19 | 57 |
| Maryland | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -79 | -54.62 | 79 | -32.00 | 7.99 | 78 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Howard | 58.97 | Should have lost by | 54.62 | 68 | 2.18 | 1 | -1.67 | 4.00 | BAD |
| Maryland | 58.97 | Should have won by | 54.62 | 623 | 56.80 | 0 | 0.00 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Howard | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-17 | 6-42 |
| Maryland | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-13 | 5-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Indiana State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 7 | 6.62 | 41 | 12.00 | 5.14 | 71 |
| Kansas | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -7 | -6.62 | 41 | -12.00 | 5.46 | 63 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Indiana State | 49.11 | Should have lost by | 6.62 | 365 | 21.25 | 2 | 1.00 | 20.00 | GOOD |
| Kansas | 49.11 | Should have won by | 6.62 | 344 | 27.86 | 3 | 3.00 | 20.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Indiana State | —— | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-14 | 4-35 |
| Kansas | YES | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 4-for-12 | 7-49 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Northern Iowa | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | 28.47 | 55 | 23.50 | 3.59 | 73 |
| Iowa State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | -28.47 | 55 | -23.50 | 5.38 | 86 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Northern Iowa | 53.66 | Should have lost by | 28.47 | 262 | 12.59 | 0 | -1.96 | 17.00 | FADE |
| Iowa State | 53.66 | Should have won by | 28.47 | 463 | 41.07 | 1 | 1.00 | 26.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Northern Iowa | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-17 | 5-50 |
| Iowa State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-18 | 5-50 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| James Madison | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 7 | -5.11 | 33 | 7.00 | 4.82 | 68 |
| West Virginia | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -7 | 5.11 | 33 | -7.00 | 4.45 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| James Madison | 42.88 | Should have won by | 5.11 | 328 | 24.00 | 3 | 2.42 | 18.00 | PLAY |
| West Virginia | 42.88 | Should have lost by | 5.11 | 294 | 18.89 | 0 | 0.00 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| James Madison | —— | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-14 | 2-20 |
| West Virginia | YES | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-18 | 6-35 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Rhode Island | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 21 | 22.94 | 61 | 25.00 | 5.77 | 65 |
| Ohio | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -21 | -22.94 | 61 | -25.00 | 7.64 | 61 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Rhode Island | 60.89 | Should have lost by | 22.94 | 375 | 18.98 | 1 | -1.08 | 21.00 | GOOD |
| Ohio | 60.89 | Should have won by | 22.94 | 466 | 41.92 | 2 | 2.00 | 23.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Rhode Island | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-14 | 4-37 |
| Ohio | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-11 | 7-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Bucknell | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 44 | 65.19 | 68 | 42.00 | 3.10 | 68 |
| Temple | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -44 | -65.19 | 68 | -42.00 | 8.48 | 82 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Bucknell | 78.76 | Should have lost by | 65.19 | 211 | 6.78 | 0 | -3.50 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Temple | 78.76 | Should have won by | 65.19 | 695 | 71.98 | 1 | 1.00 | 32.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Bucknell | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-17 | 3-25 |
| Temple | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 11-for-15 | 6-63 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Eastern Washington | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 33 | 35.22 | 61 | 24.50 | 4.22 | 65 |
| Washington | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -33 | -35.22 | 61 | -24.50 | 7.04 | 81 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Eastern Washington | 63.47 | Should have lost by | 35.22 | 274 | 14.12 | 0 | -2.04 | 16.00 | BAD |
| Washington | 63.47 | Should have won by | 35.22 | 570 | 49.34 | 0 | 0.00 | 27.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Eastern Washington | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 8-for-17 | 5-28 |
| Washington | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-15 | 5-38 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Holy Cross | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 38 | 36.46 | 52 | 24.50 | 4.22 | 55 |
| Navy | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -38 | -36.46 | 52 | -24.50 | 6.99 | 76 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Holy Cross | 57.75 | Should have lost by | 36.46 | 232 | 10.65 | 1 | -1.04 | 13.00 | BAD |
| Navy | 57.75 | Should have won by | 36.46 | 531 | 47.11 | 2 | 2.00 | 32.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Holy Cross | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-11 | 3-15 |
| Navy | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-12 | 3-25 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Idaho | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 72 | 65.01 | 86 | 42.50 | 2.69 | 54 |
| Penn State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -72 | -65.01 | 86 | -42.50 | 8.21 | 82 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Idaho | 73.39 | Should have lost by | 65.01 | 145 | 4.19 | 1 | -2.54 | 5.00 | BAD |
| Penn State | 73.39 | Should have won by | 65.01 | 673 | 69.20 | 1 | 1.00 | 35.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Idaho | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-15 | 10-67 |
| Penn State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 1-for-8 | 3-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| East Tennessee State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 35 | 27.05 | 49 | 33.50 | 4.56 | 64 |
| Appalachian State | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -35 | -27.05 | 49 | -33.50 | 6.73 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| East Tennessee State | 56.18 | Should have lost by | 27.05 | 292 | 14.57 | 1 | -1.79 | 17.00 | PLAY |
| Appalachian State | 56.18 | Should have won by | 27.05 | 444 | 41.61 | 0 | 0.00 | 25.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| East Tennessee State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 7-60 |
| Appalachian State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-10 | 5-58 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Colgate | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 41 | 30.55 | 55 | 23.50 | 3.22 | 50 |
| Air Force | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -41 | -30.55 | 55 | -23.50 | 7.03 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Colgate | 47.74 | Should have lost by | 30.55 | 161 | 8.60 | 2 | 0.04 | 11.00 | BAD |
| Air Force | 47.74 | Should have won by | 30.55 | 464 | 39.15 | 1 | 1.00 | 24.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Colgate | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-11 | 3-25 |
| Air Force | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 4-for-7 | 2-25 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Montana State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 35 | 49.79 | 55 | 29.00 | 4.82 | 60 |
| Texas Tech | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -35 | -49.79 | 55 | -29.00 | 7.27 | 95 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Montana State | 76.18 | Should have lost by | 49.79 | 289 | 13.19 | 0 | -2.42 | 8.00 | BAD |
| Texas Tech | 76.18 | Should have won by | 49.79 | 691 | 62.99 | 1 | 1.00 | 35.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Montana State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-16 | 2-15 |
| Texas Tech | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-15 | 4-29 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Portland State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 7 | 22.48 | 33 | 30.50 | 3.77 | 61 |
| Arkansas | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -7 | -22.48 | 33 | -30.50 | 5.13 | 77 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Portland State | 47.60 | Should have lost by | 22.48 | 230 | 12.56 | 3 | 0.46 | 16.00 | GOOD |
| Arkansas | 47.60 | Should have won by | 22.48 | 395 | 35.04 | 1 | 1.00 | 26.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Portland State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 2-for-13 | 10-85 |
| Arkansas | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-15 | 7-70 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Campbell | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 29 | 49.11 | 57 | 37.00 | 2.47 | 58 |
| Troy | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -29 | -49.11 | 57 | -37.00 | 7.98 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Campbell | 56.65 | Should have lost by | 49.11 | 143 | 3.77 | 0 | -3.08 | 14.00 | FADE |
| Troy | 56.65 | Should have won by | 49.11 | 527 | 52.88 | 1 | 1.00 | 25.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Campbell | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-15 | 9-66 |
| Troy | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 8-for-14 | 10-89 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Sam Houston State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 8 | -3.06 | 70 | 6.00 | 5.87 | 95 |
| New Mexico | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -8 | 3.06 | 70 | -6.00 | 6.74 | 72 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Sam Houston State | 71.85 | Should have won by | 3.06 | 558 | 37.45 | 1 | 0.50 | 27.00 | PLAY |
| New Mexico | 71.85 | Should have lost by | 3.06 | 485 | 34.39 | 0 | 0.00 | 20.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Sam Houston State | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 4-for-20 | 12-104 |
| New Mexico | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-15 | 9-90 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Incarnate Word | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 28 | 26.22 | 42 | 9.50 | 3.94 | 53 |
| Texas-San Antonio | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -28 | -26.22 | 42 | -9.50 | 5.83 | 84 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Incarnate Word | 49.69 | Should have lost by | 26.22 | 209 | 11.74 | 1 | 0.21 | 0.00 | BAD |
| Texas-San Antonio | 49.69 | Should have won by | 26.22 | 490 | 37.95 | 2 | 2.00 | 0.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Incarnate Word | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 0-for-10 | 5-55 |
| Texas-San Antonio | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | 8-for-14 | 13-145 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Virginia Military | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 39 | 57.12 | 73 | 44.00 | 3.84 | 67 |
| Marshall | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -39 | -57.12 | 73 | -44.00 | 7.56 | 82 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Virginia Military | 74.98 | Should have lost by | 57.12 | 257 | 8.93 | 1 | -2.67 | 17.00 | FADE |
| Marshall | 74.98 | Should have won by | 57.12 | 620 | 66.05 | 2 | 2.00 | 35.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Virginia Military | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-17 | 8-50 |
| Marshall | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-11 | 8-78 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| UC – Davis | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 14 | 29.06 | 40 | 16.50 | 3.88 | 68 |
| California | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -14 | -29.06 | 40 | -16.50 | 5.96 | 79 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| UC – Davis | 53.00 | Should have lost by | 29.06 | 264 | 11.97 | 1 | -0.38 | 15.00 | FADE |
| California | 53.00 | Should have won by | 29.06 | 471 | 41.03 | 4 | 4.00 | 24.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| UC – Davis | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-17 | 7-50 |
| California | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 4-for-15 | 5-42 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Norfolk State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 3 | 10.97 | 45 | 25.50 | 4.54 | 59 |
| Old Dominion | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -3 | -10.97 | 45 | -25.50 | 4.63 | 63 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Norfolk State | 40.15 | Should have lost by | 10.97 | 268 | 14.59 | 3 | 0.88 | 15.00 | GOOD |
| Old Dominion | 40.15 | Should have won by | 10.97 | 292 | 25.56 | 2 | 2.00 | 20.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Norfolk State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-13 | 5-45 |
| Old Dominion | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-13 | 6-60 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Monmouth | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 35 | 23.99 | 61 | 26.00 | 3.98 | 81 |
| Western Michigan | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -35 | -23.99 | 61 | -26.00 | 7.90 | 58 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Monmouth | 57.32 | Should have lost by | 23.99 | 322 | 16.66 | 0 | -2.17 | 23.00 | PLAY |
| Western Michigan | 57.32 | Should have won by | 23.99 | 458 | 40.65 | 0 | 0.00 | 23.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Monmouth | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 12-for-21 | 7-47 |
| Western Michigan | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | —— | 5-for-9 | 8-74 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Nicholls State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 35 | 29.73 | 63 | 22.00 | 6.73 | 41 |
| Kansas State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -35 | -29.73 | 63 | -22.00 | 7.16 | 80 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Nicholls State | 63.11 | Should have lost by | 29.73 | 276 | 16.69 | 2 | 0.17 | 11.00 | BAD |
| Kansas State | 63.11 | Should have won by | 29.73 | 573 | 46.42 | 0 | 0.00 | 33.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Nicholls State | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 1-for-6 | 2-19 |
| Kansas State | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 10-for-12 | 2-20 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Illinois State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 14 | 11.70 | 34 | 7.00 | 3.97 | 60 |
| Northern Illinois | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -14 | -11.70 | 34 | -7.00 | 5.72 | 68 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Illinois State | 43.85 | Should have lost by | 11.70 | 238 | 16.07 | 2 | 1.42 | 14.00 | BAD |
| Northern Illinois | 43.85 | Should have won by | 11.70 | 389 | 27.77 | 1 | 1.00 | 17.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Illinois State | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | —— | 1-for-14 | 4-36 |
| Northern Illinois | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | 3-for-15 | 8-86 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Alcorn State | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | 28 | 22.60 | 48 | 24.00 | 3.42 | 67 |
| Southern Mississippi | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | -28 | -22.60 | 48 | -24.00 | 6.59 | 59 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Alcorn State | 45.70 | Should have lost by | 22.60 | 229 | 11.55 | 2 | 0.00 | 15.00 | PLAY |
| Southern Mississippi | 45.70 | Should have won by | 22.60 | 389 | 34.15 | 2 | 2.00 | 16.00 | FADE |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Alcorn State | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 6-for-16 | 7-67 |
| Southern Mississippi | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 7-for-13 | 10-81 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Stephen F. Austin | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 39 | 43.22 | 73 | 43.00 | 4.47 | 62 |
| Baylor | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -39 | -43.22 | 73 | -43.00 | 7.00 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Stephen F. Austin | 65.52 | Should have lost by | 43.22 | 277 | 11.15 | 1 | -2.58 | 13.00 | FADE |
| Baylor | 65.52 | Should have won by | 43.22 | 518 | 54.37 | 1 | 1.00 | 30.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Stephen F. Austin | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-16 | 4-50 |
| Baylor | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 8-for-13 | 5-30 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Abilene Christian | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 20 | 24.18 | 82 | 23.50 | 6.42 | 71 |
| North Texas | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -20 | -24.18 | 82 | -23.50 | 7.99 | 72 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Abilene Christian | 74.39 | Should have lost by | 24.18 | 456 | 25.10 | 1 | -0.96 | 20.00 | FADE |
| North Texas | 74.39 | Should have won by | 24.18 | 575 | 49.28 | 1 | 1.00 | 26.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Abilene Christian | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | 9-for-17 | 5-35 |
| North Texas | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | 5-for-13 | 4-45 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Arkansas-Pine Bluff | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 32 | 51.79 | 46 | 54.50 | 3.47 | 62 |
| Texas Christian | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -32 | -51.79 | 46 | -54.50 | 5.98 | 81 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Arkansas-Pine Bluff | 64.26 | Should have lost by | 51.79 | 215 | 6.24 | 2 | -2.54 | 9.00 | GOOD |
| Texas Christian | 64.26 | Should have won by | 51.79 | 484 | 58.02 | 2 | 2.00 | 25.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Arkansas-Pine Bluff | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 4-for-17 | 7-78 |
| Texas Christian | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 9-for-18 | 1-5 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Grambling State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 22 | 24.30 | 40 | 28.50 | 5.73 | 71 |
| UL Monroe | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -22 | -24.30 | 40 | -28.50 | 7.48 | 67 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Grambling State | 66.46 | Should have lost by | 24.30 | 407 | 21.08 | 1 | -1.38 | 21.00 | GOOD |
| UL Monroe | 66.46 | Should have won by | 24.30 | 501 | 45.38 | 1 | 1.00 | 24.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Grambling State | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 6-for-15 | 10-85 |
| UL Monroe | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 7-for-14 | 9-76 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Houston Baptist | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 2 | 19.66 | 70 | 18.00 | 5.82 | 71 |
| Texas El Paso | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -2 | -19.66 | 70 | -18.00 | 7.70 | 66 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Houston Baptist | 65.34 | Should have lost by | 19.66 | 413 | 22.84 | 1 | -0.50 | 23.00 | FADE |
| Texas El Paso | 65.34 | Should have won by | 19.66 | 508 | 42.50 | 2 | 2.00 | 20.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Houston Baptist | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | 6-for-14 | 5-35 |
| Texas El Paso | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | 5-for-11 | 6-75 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Weber State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 6 | 10.09 | 6 | 12.00 | 3.02 | 51 |
| San Diego State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -6 | -10.09 | 6 | -12.00 | 3.26 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Weber State | 27.70 | Should have lost by | 10.09 | 154 | 8.81 | 1 | 0.00 | 5.00 | GOOD |
| San Diego State | 27.70 | Should have won by | 10.09 | 238 | 18.89 | 1 | 1.00 | 14.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Weber State | —— | —— | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | 3-for-15 | 5-31 |
| San Diego State | YES | YES | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | 5-for-20 | 2-10 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Southern Utah | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Lower Scoring | 33 | 28.61 | 79 | 25.00 | 4.26 | 80 |
| UNLV | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Lower Scoring | -33 | -28.61 | 79 | -25.00 | 7.32 | 73 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Southern Utah | 64.56 | Should have lost by | 28.61 | 341 | 17.98 | 1 | -1.08 | 18.00 | BAD |
| UNLV | 64.56 | Should have won by | 28.61 | 534 | 46.58 | 1 | 1.00 | 27.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Southern Utah | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | —— | 7-for-19 | 4-38 |
| UNLV | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-12 | 1-5 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Boise State | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -5 | -11.15 | 67 | 6.50 | 5.75 | 108 |
| Florida State | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 5 | 11.15 | 67 | -6.50 | 6.87 | 62 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Boise State | 71.75 | Should have won by | 11.15 | 621 | 41.45 | 3 | 2.46 | 38.00 | GOOD |
| Florida State | 71.75 | Should have lost by | 11.15 | 426 | 30.30 | 2 | 2.00 | 19.00 | BAD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Boise State | YES | YES | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 10-for-19 | 6-35 |
| Florida State | —— | —— | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 1-for-12 | 5-44 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Houston | Won ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | 18 | 39.01 | 80 | 22.00 | 5.91 | 69 |
| Oklahoma | Lost ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | -18 | -39.01 | 80 | -22.00 | 11.25 | 61 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Houston | 80.20 | Should have lost by | 39.01 | 408 | 20.60 | 0 | -1.83 | 25.00 | FADE |
| Oklahoma | 80.20 | Should have won by | 39.01 | 686 | 59.61 | 2 | 2.00 | 30.00 | PLAY |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Houston | —— | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | 5-for-13 | 6-48 |
| Oklahoma | YES | YES | —— | YES | —— | YES | —— | 5-for-8 | 7-94 |
| Team | ATS | Act. yds vs act. spread | Game should’ve been.. | Win Margin | Yds/TO spread conv. | Game tot | Closing Line | YPP | OFF Plays |
| Notre Dame | Lost ATS | Worse than predicted | Higher Scoring | -18 | -9.13 | 52 | -19.50 | 6.51 | 65 |
| Louisville | Won ATS | Better than predicted | Higher Scoring | 18 | 9.13 | 52 | 19.50 | 5.30 | 74 |
| Yppt. Total | W/L Projection | Margin | Actual Yds | Score should’ve been.. | TO | Adjusted TO | 1st Downs | Next Week | |
| Notre Dame | 57.53 | Should have won by | 9.13 | 423 | 33.33 | 1 | 1.00 | 18.00 | BAD |
| Louisville | 57.53 | Should have lost by | 9.13 | 392 | 24.20 | 3 | 1.38 | 21.00 | GOOD |
| Won Game | Total Yards | Plays Run | YPP | Adj TO | 1st Downs | Rush Att | 3rd Down EFF | Penalties | |
| Notre Dame | YES | YES | —— | YES | YES | —— | —— | 5-for-12 | 4-20 |
| Louisville | —— | —— | YES | —— | —— | YES | YES | 6-for-15 | 8-50 |